Civics
‍
How people build the relationships, practices, institutions, and collective agency needed to participate in shaping a shared future.

Part of Love & Work's continuing inquiry into what human beings are capable of becoming.

social intelligence

Hope is a group project.

"The essential challenge is to transform the isolation and self-interest within our communities into connectedness and caring for the whole." — Peter Block
Alexander W. Galbraith, Barn Raising in Lansing (circa 1900)

We are just weeks away from a consequential midterm election, and like you I find myself increasingly frightened by what is happening to American democracy. The Trump administration continues to test the limits of presidential power and the institutions designed to constrain it. Enormous wealth increasingly buys access and influence. The rush to build massive data centers, while communities contend with their demands for power, water, and land, is only the latest obvious manifestation. Rules and norms that once seemed durable suddenly seem much less so. And all around me I hear thoughtful people wondering whether anything they do can possibly make a difference.

That last part may frighten me most. Lately I’ve been wondering what happens when enough people conclude that nothing they do matters.

Carlyn Beccia recently introduced me to a useful idea she calls the “asshole threshold.” Cooperation works when most people believe that other people will cooperate too. But when enough people cheat, exploit, lie, or simply look out for themselves, cooperation begins to seem foolish. Why follow the rules when the assholes don’t?

Eventually the cooperators begin to defect too. That sounds uncomfortably familiar. But there is another side to the story. Research on cooperation suggests that cooperators become more resilient when they find one another, interact repeatedly, and discover that cooperation can actually work.

I keep thinking about what this means for community. Maybe one reason so many of us feel powerless is that we experience the enormous problems confronting us as individuals. Climate change. Concentrated wealth. Threats to democracy. Each is far beyond anything I can affect by myself.

But community changes the scale of the question. You show up. You meet people you didn’t know. Someone listens. Someone knows something you don’t. Someone has a skill, a relationship, a building, a truck, a garden, an idea. You begin to discover what exists among you. You imagine something that none of you could accomplish alone.

And then you do something. Something changes. That experience matters. The question shifts from What can I possibly do? to What might we be able to do together?

‍
Maybe this is what start where you are really means. Whenever people have a chance to know one another, discover what they have among them, imagine what might be possible, and accomplish something together, they experience their own collective capacity.

These experiences are still far too rare. But each one provides evidence that cooperation works. Perhaps hope isn’t something we need to convince one another to feel. Perhaps it is something we create together.

civics, civic capacity

Community is built one gathering at a time.

I like Peter Block’s contention that a community’s capacity to create its future resides not primarily in its leaders, but in its citizens and their relationships. In Community, he proposes the small group as the unit of transformation: bring people together, ask questions that matter, discover what each can contribute, and create something together. The experience shifts people from waiting for solutions to discovering their own capacity to act together.

BOOK: Community: The Structure of Belonging

CIVICS, SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE

The opposite of helplessness may be connection.

Carlyn Beccia warns that when corruption and self-dealing become common, cooperation starts to look foolish. But drawing on Robert Axelrod’s game theory and the civic organizing of the Gilded Age, she finds reason for hope: cooperation becomes more resilient when cooperators find one another and keep showing up. I like her suggestion that community may be where we find evidence that cooperation works—and where we rediscover our collective power.

ARTICLE: Has America Crossed the Asshole Threshold?

CIVICS, ASSET-BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Look what we've got.

Asset-Based Community Development turns the usual approach to community building on its head. Rather than beginning with problems and deficiencies, John McKnight and Jody Kretzmann begin by discovering the people, relationships, skills, knowledge, spaces, and resources already present. In the process, people discover one another and begin connecting capacities that had been scattered and unseen. The question shifts from What do we lack? to What might we do with what we already have?

ARTICLE: Asset Based Community Development (ABCD)

CIVICS, SOCIAL TECHNOLOGY

Your backyard is wilder than you are.

Over the past fifty years, practitioners have developed radically different ways for groups to think and act together. World Café, Open Space, Circle, Appreciative Inquiry, Liberating Structures, and other “social technologies” replace arguing competing points of view with practices that help people listen to and learn from one another. Their premise is radical: change the way people come together, and you can change what they become capable of doing together.

FOLLOW THE THREAD

*About the photograph


Alexander W. Galbraith photographed this barn raising in Lansing, then a rural community and now part of North York in Toronto, around 1900.

I am moved by what the photograph contains. There is no obvious expert at the center directing everyone else. Instead, scores of people with different roles and abilities have gathered to accomplish something none could readily do alone.

They aren’t discussing community, they are producing it. And the barn is almost beside the point. The tangible product of the gathering is a building. But another product is the experience people take home: we can do things together.

‍
That is a lovely expression of a truth I want to find and celebrate again and again: Community is one of the places where people learn and relearn that cooperation works.

"Progress is people flourishing."
‍
-Ted Gioia

Maybe the way we meet is part of the problem.

Peter Block’s organization, Designed Learning, asks and answers a powerful question on its website: “How do you change the world? One room at a time. What room? The one you’re in.”

FOLLOW THE THREAD

Look what we’ve got.

Most efforts to improve communities begin with problems. What is broken? What is missing? Who needs help? What services do we need?

ARTICLE: Asset Based Community Development (ABCD)

The opposite of helplessness may be connection.

My longtime friend, client, and idea collaborator, Jamie Wolf, sent me an article with a title that was pretty much impossible to ignore: Carlyn Beccia’s “Has America Crossed the Asshole Threshold?”

ARTICLE: Has America Crossed the Asshole Threshold?

Community is built one gathering at a time.

Peter Block spent the first half of his career thinking about organizations. He began as an organizational consultant at Esso in the 1960s, when the field of organizational development was still being invented. His books Flawless Consulting, The Empowered Manager, and Stewardship explored a question that became increasingly central to his work: How do you create organizations in which people take responsibility rather than simply follow instructions?

BOOK: Community: The Structure of Belonging
No items found.

Hope is group project.

We are just weeks away from a consequential midterm election, and like you I find myself increasingly frightened by what is happening to American democracy. The Trump administration continues to test the limits of presidential power and the institutions designed to constrain it. Enormous wealth increasingly buys access and influence. The rush to build massive data centers, while communities contend with their demands for power, water, and land, is only the latest obvious manifestation. Rules and norms that once seemed durable suddenly seem much less so. And all around me I hear thoughtful people wondering whether anything they do can possibly make a difference.

Start where you live: Learning to see local power

Democracy doesn’t happen only in legislatures and city halls. It also happens in the neighborhoods, districts, parks, and main streets where people decide how to live together. Hyperlocal is a book about how that work actually gets done.

BOOK: Hyperlocal: Place Governance in a Fragmented World

The places that hold us together

It’s become downright difficult to find places where people who live different lives can simply spend time together.

ARTICLE: Want to Support a Healthy Democracy? Start Here.

A pattern‑based approach to public problem‑solving

For organizers, educators, and public‑sector innovators who are trying to redesign how we tackle complex social problems, Pattern Languages for Public Problem‑Solving: Cultivating New Seeds for Social Change is a conceptual and practical gateway into using pattern thinking for civic work.

PDF: Pattern Languages for Public Problem‑Solving: Cultivating New Seeds for Social Change

America Unfinished: A plain-sight inventory of the state of the nation

This letter is being posted on July 3, 2026, the day before America’s 250th anniversary. Like many people, I’m not feeling particularly celebratory. The fireworks, the flags, the fighter jets, the politicians blessing the republic, the sponsors blessing an innacurate myth, the logos blessing the sponsors—the whole noisy American pageant arrives at a moment when many of us feel more weary than triumphant, more anxious than proud.

The way we come together matters.

Earlier this month Alex Ross wrote a lucid, unsettling portrait of the stubbornly hopeful Jürgen Habermas, a philosopher who spent much of his life asking how human beings might learn to govern themselves together. I had to read “Jürgen Habermas Defended Reason in a Darkening Age” twice: once because it is deliciously dense with philosophy and intellectual history, and again because I kept recognizing themes that have long shaped my own thinking.

ARTICLE: Jürgen Habermas’s Unfinished Project

The legitimacy gap in democracy is no accident. It’s a feature of the design.

Jeremy Lent knows the modern economy from the inside. He built a successful internet company, then came to believe that the very systems rewarding him were also producing loneliness, inequality, ecological damage, and civic decay. Since then, he has turned his attention to a harder question: why our political and economic institutions so often concentrate power upward instead of distributing it outward.

ARTICLE: “Democracy” Was Never Designed to Work — But Something Better Is Emerging

Societies struggle to confront major challenges when so much wealth, decision-making power, and political influence are concentrated in a small group of technology companies.

What would it look like to have a government that genuinely served public rather than private interests? (One can dream.)Consider the Finns, who treat infrastructure less as a profit center than as part of the basic fabric of everyday life. In Finland, broadband access is treated as a legal right, and communication networks, education, and public services are designed around security, accessibility, and social trust rather than short-term financial return.

ESSAY: The Little Book of Public Interest Technology